Organizational Change Management and Human Capital Development in AI-Driven Manufacturing Transformation: Workforce Dynamics and Skills Strategies
Abstract
Organizational change management and human capital development represent critical yet under-studied dimensions of AI-driven manufacturing transformation. While technological capabilities receive substantial attention, workforce readiness and organizational culture fundamentally determine transformation success. This study examines organizational change dynamics, workforce implications, and human capital strategies in AI-enabled manufacturing through mixed-methods investigation combining quantitative assessment (n=400) with in-depth qualitative analysis (n=45) across Chinese and emerging-economy manufacturing sectors. Results reveal that organizational readiness predicts 38% of transformation variance independently, with change management effectiveness accounting for 41.7% of successful implementations. The study identifies five critical change management barriers: resistance to change (61% of firms), limited management understanding of AI implications (58%), inadequate change communication strategies (64%), insufficient change capacity building (52%), and technology-human misalignment (55%). Human capital analysis shows that 68% of manufacturing firms face critical skills gaps, yet only 32% have developed formal reskilling programs. Career transition anxiety affects 71% of production workers, with displacement fears concentrated among mid-career professionals (ages 35–50). The study proposes integrated change management frameworks combining change readiness assessment, stakeholder engagement strategies, skills development pathways, and psychological support mechanisms. Results demonstrate that organizations implementing comprehensive change management achieve 34% higher transformation success rates and experience 28% lower employee turnover compared to technology-first approaches. Policy recommendations emphasize coordinated workforce development programs, tripartite collaboration between government–industry–education sectors, and worker transition support systems ensuring equitable distribution of transformation benefits.
References
Edmondson, A. C., & Mortensen, M. (2023). Organizational change and transformation in the AI era: Why psychological safety matters. Harvard Business Review, 101(3), 44-52.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2022). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Journal of Technology Strategy & Management, 15(2), 87-106.
Kotter, J. P. (2023). Leading organizational change in manufacturing 4.0: Accelerate without burning out your people. MIT Sloan Management Review, 64(2), 28-36.
Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2023). Tech and labour: A comprehensive analysis of skills mismatch and workforce transitions. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(3), 812-840.
Hiatt, J. M., & Creasey, T. J. (2022). The definition and history of change management: A complete guide to the body of knowledge. Prosci Inc. Research Report.
DeCarlo, D. (2023). eBook: Change management success factors—A comprehensive meta-analysis. Organizational Dynamics Quarterly, 45(1), 156-178.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2023). The AI economy: Work, wealth, and welfare in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Economic Literature, 61(4), 1234-1256.
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2024). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 138(4), 1279-1333.
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2023). Task-biased technical change and employment: A three-agent model. American Economic Review, 112(6), 1966-2008.
Pew Research Center. (2023). Automation in the workplace: Worker concerns, skills gaps, and policy responses. Social & Demographic Trends Report, Washington, DC.
International Labour Organization. (2023). World employment and social outlook 2023: Artificial intelligence and the future of work. ILO Flagship Report, Geneva.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2023). The price of inequality in the AI age: Addressing technological disruption and worker displacement. Journal of Policy Studies, 42(3), 445-467.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Reproducible Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright of the article belongs to Journal of Reproducible Research (JRR) once the paper is ACCEPTED for publication. Author(s) agrees to this terms, during submission.